I’m the Principal Attorney at The Data Privacy Lawyer.
HI THERE, I’M Funmi
Introduction
Telecommunications providers — including wireless carriers, internet service providers (ISPs), and telecom operators — handle some of the most sensitive consumer data: call‑detail records, internet usage, location data, device identifiers, billing information, and more. Because telecoms sit at the core of modern connectivity, they play a dual role: enabling critical services, but also bearing a high level of responsibility for protecting subscriber privacy.
In the United States, telecom companies are subject to overlapping obligations under federal laws and regulatory frameworks — including but not limited to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulations under the Communications Act of 1934 (as amended) and general data‑privacy and security standards under the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTC Act). Recent enforcement actions confirm that regulators are willing to impose substantial penalties when carriers fail to safeguard or misuse subscriber data.
For telecom executives and decision‑makers, maintaining strong compliance, transparency, and data‑governance practices is essential not only to avoid legal liability — but also to preserve customer trust and corporate reputation.
What Federal and Regulatory Law Require from Telecom Providers
Telecom operators must ensure compliance with several core principles and legal requirements when handling consumer data:
Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) Safeguards: Location data, call‑detail records, and similar usage data are often considered “Customer Proprietary Network Information.” Carriers must treat such data with high security, limit access, and ensure it is not disclosed improperly or sold without proper consent and safeguards.
Transparency and Notice to Consumers: Customers should be informed about what data is collected, how it is used, whether it will be shared, and under what circumstances. Any marketing or third‑party use of personal or location data should be disclosed clearly.
Reasonable Security and Data Protection Measures: Carriers must implement appropriate technical, administrative, and organizational safeguards to protect PII and location data — including encryption, secure access controls, vendor oversight, logging, audits, and secure deletion or retention policies.
Vendor and Third‑Party Oversight: When carriers outsource data processing, storage, or commercialization (e.g., to location‑data aggregators, analytics firms, or marketing partners), the carriers remain legally responsible. Vendor contracts must reflect privacy/security obligations, and carriers must actively oversee compliance.
Compliance with FCC & FTC Regulations: Violations can trigger regulatory enforcement, fines, and required remedial actions — especially when there is improper disclosure of location or usage data, selling of data without consent, or failures in safeguarding subscribers’ private information.
Verified Enforcement Cases: What Regulators Have Done Recently
Here are real-world enforcement actions against major U.S. carriers that highlight regulatory risk and underscore why compliance matters:
April 2024 — FCC Imposes Nearly US$200 Million in Fines on Major Wireless Carriers for Illegally Sharing Customer Location Data The FCC issued Forfeiture Orders against the largest U.S. wireless carriers — including AT&T, T‑Mobile (including legacy Sprint), and Verizon Communications — after finding they had sold or shared real‑time customer location information with third‑party data aggregators and other entities without proper customer consent or adequate safeguards. The total fines amounted to roughly US$196 million.
According to the FCC, these carriers failed to meet their obligations under CPNI rules, improperly delegated control over sensitive location data, and did not implement reasonable measures to prevent unauthorized disclosure — resulting in misuse of customer data by aggregators and downstream parties.
2023 — Data‑Security Class Action Settlement by T‑Mobile After a Major Breach In a significant class action titled In re: T‑Mobile Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, approximately 76.6 million U.S. residents were affected by a breach of T‑Mobile’s systems that exposed personally identifiable information (PII), including Social Security numbers, driver’s license numbers, and technical identifiers.
The case concluded in a US$350 million settlement (final approval June 29, 2023), with funds established for affected customers, identity‑protection services, and commitment by T‑Mobile to invest in enhanced cybersecurity.
These examples show regulators and courts treat both active data misuse (e.g., selling location data without consent) and data‑security failures (e.g., breaches exposing PII) as serious compliance violations.
Implications for Telecom Providers: Risks Are Real and Multi‑Faceted
The enforcement history underscores several key risks for telecom companies:
Substantial Financial Penalties — The nearly US$200 million FCC fines demonstrate that data‑sharing and privacy violations can lead to large regulatory costs.
Reputational Damage and Loss of Trust — Customers expect privacy and security; news of data leaks or improper data sales can erode trust and lead to customer churn.
Legal Exposure Beyond Regulators — Breaches may trigger class‑action lawsuits, regulatory investigations, or civil liability, as seen with T‑Mobile’s settlement.
Ongoing Compliance Obligations — Carriers cannot rely on liability waivers or vendor disclaimers; they remain responsible for ensuring third-party compliance, and must maintain robust data‑governance frameworks.
Together, these risks make robust privacy and data‑security compliance not optional — but essential for sustainable operations.
Practical Compliance Roadmap for Telecom Decision‑Makers
Here’s a detailed, step‑by‑step roadmap to strengthen compliance, data governance, and consumer‑privacy protection in telecommunications operations:
Comprehensive Data Inventory & Flow Mapping
List all categories of customer data collected (location, usage, billing, identifiers).
Map how data flows through systems — from collection to storage, third‑party sharing, aggregation, retention, and deletion.
Flag sensitive data (location, real‑time tracking, unique identifiers) that require higher protection.
Ensure that privacy notices clearly describe what data is collected, how it may be used or shared, and obtain explicit customer consent for any sharing or sale of data (especially location data).
Regularly review and update policies — avoid vague or marketing‑style language that may mislead consumers.
Vendor Management & Oversight
Audit all third‑party vendors (data aggregators, marketing firms, analytics providers) to ensure they meet high privacy and security standards.
Encrypt sensitive data (in transit and at rest), apply strong access controls, maintain logs, and conduct regular vulnerability assessments.
Segment data access internally — only authorized personnel should view or process sensitive data.
Establish data‑retention policies: delete or anonymize data once no longer necessary.
Incident Response & Breach‑Readiness Planning
Develop and maintain a formal incident‑response plan: detection, containment, investigation, consumer notification, remediation, and documentation.
Prepare to cooperate with regulatory inquiries, provide transparency reports, and remediate identified vulnerabilities promptly.
Periodic Compliance Audits & Risk Assessments
Conduct regular internal audits or engage external auditors to review data practices, vendor compliance, security infrastructure, and policy adherence.
Assess risks associated with new services (e.g., location‑based offerings, data sharing with partners, value‑added services) before rollout.
Staff Training & Cultural Integration of Privacy Principles
Train all employees — especially technical, marketing, and vendor‑management teams — on privacy obligations, data‑handling protocols, CPNI rules, and potential liabilities.
Encourage a “privacy‑by‑design” mindset: treat data protection as integral to any service offering or business decision.
Transparent Consumer Communication & Trust Building
Maintain transparent channels for customers to understand data practices, request deletion, or ask for information about how their data is used.
Consider offering privacy‑friendly options or opt‑out mechanisms for customers concerned about data sharing or location tracking.
Why Partnering with a Specialized U.S. Federal Privacy & Telecom Compliance Firm Matters
Navigating the complex regulations that apply to telecommunications — including overlapping obligations under the FCC, FTC, and other regulatory frameworks — can be challenging. Add to that the technical, operational, and vendor‑management complexity, and compliance becomes a demanding task.
That’s why working with specialized advisors is often the most effective solution. At The Data Privacy Lawyer PLLC, we assist telecom firms in:
Mapping data flows and identifying regulatory risk areas
Reviewing and drafting privacy policies, consent mechanisms, and vendor contracts
Designing and implementing data‑security frameworks and compliance programs
Preparing incident‑response plans, breach‑notification procedures, and remediation protocols
Conducting compliance audits, vendor‑oversight reviews, and training for staff
By embedding compliance into operations — not as an afterthought — telecom providers can avoid regulatory penalties, reduce privacy risk, and build long‑term trust with customers.
A practical checklist to evaluate and strengthen the foundation of your privacy program—so you’re not caught off guard by gaps, risks, or outdated practices.
When compliance feels overwhelming, it’s easy to freeze or delay action. This checklist helps you cut through the noise, identify what’s missing, and move forward with clarity and confidence. Let’s simplify the complex and get your privacy program into proactive, aligned motion.
A checklist for your business to evaluate your current privacy program posture.